Case: CIT
Vs Orient Instrument Pvt Ltd (Delhi High Court)
Facts: The
assessee was primarily engaged in the business of trading of crafts paper. The
assessee also purchased and sold some shares for which he claimed a loss of Rs.
5.53 Lakhs.
AO
held that under the Explanation to Sec 73, the said loss of shares was deemed
to be arising from speculative transactions and thus cannot be allowed to be
set off against business profits.
The
CIT(A) and Tribunal allowed the assessee claim by holding that the assessee was
not engaged in the “business” of
purchase and sale of shares and therefore exp to sec 73 does not apply.
Department
appealed before the High Court and argued that even a single transaction of
sale or purchase of shares might amount to a “business”
HELD
by the High Court in favour of assessee:
·
The assessee was engaged in the business of trading
of crafts paper, installation, job work, consultancy and commission.
·
By all means, transaction whereby it purchased
shares and incurred losses on account of the fall in value of share was a
solitary one.
·
Findings of Tribunal that transaction did not
constitute business carried on by company, cannot be termed as perverse or
unreasonable.
·
In circumstances, the court is satisfied that no
substantial question or law arises. Appeal was accordingly dismissed
CA
Rahul Jain
No comments:
Post a Comment